Vetted engineers who join your standups, your repo and your board — with a tech lead reviewing the code and a PM running delivery. You interview, you choose.
Eight years of shipping software for founders, agencies and product teams across the US and Europe.
Most teams do not have a code problem, they have a hiring problem. Here is what changes when the developers are already vetted and waiting.
Hiring in-house
With a dedicated team
Your developers work in your tools, your workflow and your timezone — on your Slack, not behind an account manager.
We shortlist from a bench that already exists, you interview, and onboarding takes about 48 hours.
Add a second developer for a launch and drop back after. Monthly, with no permanent headcount on your books.
A tech lead reviews the code and a PM tracks delivery, so engineering management is not your job.
Hire dedicated developers with zero overhead. Scale your team instantly no contracts, no HR hassles, no long onboarding cycles.
Themes, plugins and WooCommerce builds — plus the performance and security work most WordPress sites never get.
APIs, queues and database design in Laravel, built to be maintained by whoever picks it up after us.
Server-rendered React with the App Router, tuned for Core Web Vitals and search from the first commit.
Component architecture and state management for interfaces that stay fast as the product grows.
Node services and real-time features, sized to your traffic rather than to a template.
One developer across the whole stack — right when the roadmap is broad and the team is small.
Cross-platform iOS and Android from a single React Native or Flutter codebase, shipped to both stores.
LLM features, model integration and automation built into the product, not bolted onto it.
Pick the shape that fits the work in front of you. Every model is monthly, and you can change it as the work changes.
Best for: A clear roadmap and one pair of hands to own it
One developer working only on your product — in your standups, your repo and your board. The most common way clients start, and the easiest to add to later.
Best for: A roadmap wider than one person can carry
Two or more engineers splitting the roadmap and reviewing each other's work, so progress does not stall when one of them is heads-down or away.
Best for: Owning a product end to end, without hiring for it
Developers plus QA, a tech lead and a project manager operating as one delivery unit. You set priorities; the unit handles everything between the ticket and the release.
Best for: Maintenance and steady iteration
Around twenty hours a week. Right when the product is live and needs consistent attention rather than a full-time push.
Best for: A defined scope with an end date
A team assembled around a specific build. We agree the scope and the shape of the team it needs, then deliver against it.
Best for: A product that will keep evolving for years
A stable squad that stays with the product and keeps the context. Our average engagement runs about two and a half years.
Best for: An in-house team with a backlog spike
Extra hands working alongside your own developers, in your process, when the backlog outruns the team you have.
Usually about a week. Here is every step, and who does what at each one.
Thirty minutes on what you are building and where it is stuck. No pitch deck.
We dig into the product, the stack and the deadline before proposing anyone.
We agree the exact roles and seniority the roadmap calls for — often not the role you had in mind.
Matching developers from the bench, with profiles and relevant work. Two to three days.
You interview and technically assess. You choose — we never assign anyone you have not met.
Accounts, repo access and tooling set up, and introductions to your team.
Your developers join the standups and start shipping against the roadmap.
Add or reduce people as the work changes. Monthly, with no re-hiring cycle.
A sample of the work — websites, platforms, custom software and integrations.
Hand-picked professionals with years of industry experience.
“We had two roles open for four months. Corammers had a developer in our standups within a week, and he is still with us two years later.”
“The thing that surprised me was the code review. Work arrived already tested — I was reviewing features, not chasing bugs.”
“We scaled from one developer to a team of four for a launch, then back down. Doing that with in-house hires would have been impossible.”
The honest version of how dedicated developers stack up against the alternatives.
| Hiring In-House | Freelancers | Traditional Agency | Dedicated Team (Us) | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Time to start | 8–12 weeks | Days, but variable | 4–8 weeks | About 1 week |
| Monthly cost (mid) | $9k–$14k loaded | $3k–$8k, unpredictable | $12k–$20k | From $700 |
| Recruitment cost | 15–25% of salary | None | Built into the rate | None |
| Vetting | You do it | You do it | Agency does it | Done before shortlist |
| You interview | Yes | Yes | Rarely | Yes, always |
| Scale up or down | Slow, painful | Easy but inconsistent | Contract renegotiation | Monthly, either way |
| Management | You manage | You manage | Agency manages | Tech lead + PM included |
| QA included | Separate hire | Rarely | Usually | Yes |
| If someone leaves | Re-hire from scratch | They vanish mid-project | Depends on contract | Replaced at our cost |
| Long-term continuity | Strong, while they stay | Weak | Varies by account | Strong — avg 2.5 years |
Figures are typical US market ranges for a mid-level developer and are indicative, not quotes.
Different domains, same requirement — developers who understand the business, not just the ticket.
The things prospective clients ask us most before booking a call.
Most engagements start within a week. We shortlist within two or three days of the discovery call, you interview, and onboarding takes about 48 hours once you have chosen someone.
Always. You interview and technically assess every developer before they join, exactly as you would an in-house hire. We never assign someone you have not met.
Part-time (around 20 hours a week), full-time (40 hours), a project-based team, or a long-term dedicated team. All are billed monthly and you can change the shape as the work changes.
Yes. Most clients start with a single developer and add people once they see the output. There is no requirement to take a full team.
Yes — developers, QA, a tech lead, UI/UX, DevOps and a project manager. You can start with one role and build up to a complete unit over time.
Yes. Your developers work a shift that overlaps your business day so questions get answered the same day rather than overnight.
A tech lead reviews the code and a project manager runs sprints and reporting, both included. You set the priorities; we handle the engineering management.
Tell us and we replace them at our cost. The tech lead retains the project context so the handover does not reset your progress.
That is one of the most common setups. Our developers join your repo, your board and your code review process as additional team members.
Slack or Teams, Jira, Asana, Trello, ClickUp or Linear, and GitHub, GitLab or Bitbucket. We adopt your stack rather than asking you to adopt ours.
One month. After that it is rolling — scale up, scale down or stop with notice. No annual lock-in.
Thirty minutes, no pitch deck, no pressure. Here is exactly how it goes.
You walk us through the product, the team you have now and what is slowing you down.
We work out what the roadmap actually needs — often different from the role you had in mind.
We propose the team shape, seniority and engagement model that fits, and what it costs.
You get matching profiles from the bench with relevant work, usually within two or three days.
You interview whoever you want to. If nobody fits, we go back and look again — no obligation.
Pick a time that suits you. Thirty minutes, straight answers, and a recommended team structure whether or not you work with us.
A clear read on what your roadmap needs and what it would cost — no obligation to proceed.
No pressure and no sales script. If in-house hiring is genuinely the better call for you, we will say so.